Advantage of lower age of criminal responsibility
1. Advantage of lower age of criminal responsibility
Whenever we watch the crime portion of the news today, we often find more reasons to lower the age of criminal responsibility. There are many social problems in a country like ours, of course, like always there is poverty, partly caused by the great concentration of people in certain cities, they usually come to work for industries that are established there. Those that are lured by the factory jobs eventually raise families and sadly, many of their children don’t get the proper guidance. Some learn to offend very early, thereby lighting up the age of criminal responsibility debate between those who are for and against it. There is an increasing buzz of agreement among people who appear to tire of these young criminals getting away with heinous crimes.
There is an advantage in changing the law with regards to this problem, and here are some of them:
It will serve as a deterrent against future crime. It will force the parents to pay more attention to their kids. It will improve the community by keeping it safe for everyone.
Hopefully, just by looking at those reasons, you can see the practicability of lowering the age of criminal responsibility.
Click on the links for more information:
https://brainly.ph/question/34690
https://brainly.ph/question/107332
https://brainly.ph/question/1414952
2. Voting age should be lowered to 16 pros and cons
Answer:
Explanation:
Pros:
Increased Youth Participation: Lowering the voting age to 16 would allow more young people to have a say in the political process and ensure that their voices are heard. This could lead to greater political engagement among young people, which could ultimately lead to more informed and engaged citizens.
Increased Civic Education: Lowering the voting age would also encourage greater civic education among young people. Schools and other organizations would have to teach younger people about the importance of voting, which could lead to a more informed and politically active population.
Consistent Age Requirements: Lowering the voting age would create a more consistent age requirement across the board, as 16 is the age when many other responsibilities and rights are granted, such as driving and working.
Cons:
Lack of Maturity: Many argue that 16-year-olds lack the maturity and life experience necessary to make informed decisions when it comes to politics. Critics argue that most teenagers are not yet mature enough to fully understand the complex issues and nuances of political decision-making.
Vulnerability to Manipulation: Some argue that 16-year-olds are more vulnerable to manipulation by politicians and special interest groups. They may be more likely to vote for someone based on superficial qualities, such as charisma or appearance, rather than based on a thorough understanding of the candidate's policy positions.
Lack of Experience: Some argue that 16-year-olds simply lack the experience necessary to understand the complexities of the political process. They may not yet have had the opportunity to participate in the workforce or pay taxes, for example, which can impact their understanding of policy issues.
3. question in negative side on lowering the age of criminal responsibility
Answer:
Explanation:
4. should we lower the age criminal liability?
yes. because mostly syndicates uses minors to do crimes
5. What are 3 PROS and CONS about: Should the drinking age in Japan be lowered to 18 year old?.
Pros of drinking under the age of 18:
- Might be enjoyed by some
- increases alcohol tolerance
- idek
Cons of drinking under the age of 18:
- early health problems
- can cause addiction
- being reckless when drunk
Other possible answers: https://www.pridesurveys.com/index.php/blog/drinking-age-debate/
6. bill lowering age of criminal responsibility from 15 to 9 years old qpproved agree or dis agre
Answer:
Sadly, lowering the age of criminal responsibility is an act of violence against children. Children in conflict with the law are already victims of circumstance, mostly because of poverty and exploitation by adult crime syndicates.
Explanation:
disagree
Answer:
Disagree
Explanation:
It's based on my research, mark me as a brainliest thanks
7. agree or not agree:Lowering the age of criminal liability
Answer:
AGREE.
Explanation:
Children as early as 9 years old are already criminally competent and capable of discernment.
Answer:
Agree
Explanation:
Because there are many minors who do crimes
8. Do you favour on lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility to 12 years old and below 18 years of age. why?
Answer:
if it's self defense its fine but even though you are minor and you are charge of murdering someone you can still be arrested you will be put in DSWD when you are still minor but when you reach the age of 18 you are going to jail
9. agree or not agree:Lowering the age of criminal liability
Answer:
agresndkdjsisbsbdbdbdbdbsbdhdbd
Answer:
what is B={x/x is a positive number
10. what is RA9344? is it right to lower the age of criminal responsibility?
Republic Act No. 9344 or the “Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act” defines the Juvenile Justice and Welfare System as a system dealing with children at risk and children in conflict with the law, which provides child-appropriate proceedings, including programmes and services for prevention, diversion, reha- bilitation, re-integration and aftercare to ensure their normal growth and development.
Yes it is right to the lower age of criminal responsibility.
11. explain what is age of criminal responsibility
The age at which a person can be charged with a criminal offence and processed within the criminal justice system.
12. EVALUATION AND JUDGEMENT ESSAY on Age of Criminal Responsibility
Answer:
For legal purposes and because of its strong implications, the concept of an age of criminal responsibility should be such that it reflects a generalised and realistic age for a person to be held responsible for a crime.
Explanation:
pa brainliest
13. three disadvantage of lowering age of criminal liability?
Answer:
By lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility, syndicate groups who exploit children into committing crimes for them, will instead use and abuse even younger children to commit their wrongdoings. What the current law needs is not another arbitrary amendment but a stronger implementation.
Explanation:
hope it helps
14. Explain The main principle of the Bill on Lowering the Age of Criminal Responsibility.
Answer:
It has been proposed that lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility will discourage adults from using children as vehicles for illegal activity, but this logic is flawed: there is a risk that lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility will encourage them to target and exploit even younger children.
Explanation:
The Coalition for Street Children is deeply concerned about legislative efforts in the Philippines to lower the age of criminal responsibility. The current legal minimum age for a child to be held criminally responsible is 15. House Bill 8858 proposed lowering the minimum age to nine years old at first. It was later amended to lower the proposed minimum age to 12 years old, and the House of Representatives approved it on second reading. The bill only needs one final reading before it can be approved and signed into law.
15. Are you in favor of lowering the age of criminality? Why or why not?
Answer:
"Lowering the age of criminal responsibility has the effect of bringing more children into contact with the criminal justice system, increasing the rate of incarceration and aggravating the risk of recidivism"
Explanation:
Sana maka tulong, pa brainliest narin po ty.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Why? Children who are exploited and driven by adults to commit crimes need to be protected, not further penalized. Instead they should be given a second chance. They're still young and there's still a lot of chance for them to change.
16. pros and cons about responsiveness
You will be usefull
Cons stress
17. Is it necessary to implement the lowering of age criminality in Philippines?
For me, Yes we need some reformation on juvenile act, children who has been involve in some criminal activities were confident enough that they will be protected the law on juvenile act and they know that they will not be put in prison because they are not yet qualified for criminal liabilities. Some criminal groups who used children to fulfill their evil plans will used juvenile act as their shield. as observed, this law has been abused over the years since it was created. There is nothing wrong with the implementation of reducing the age of criminality as long as it is in line with the due process of law. Even the BIBLE requires to discipline children in Proverbs 23:13-14 Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you punish them with the rod, they will not die. Punish them with the rod and save them from death.
18. pros and cons having legal drinking age
[tex]\huge\mathfrak\red{answer}[/tex]
_______________________________________
For decades, ever since the days of Prohibition, in fact, many politicians, academics, and parents alike have engaged in the drinking age debate the question being whether or not the legal drinking age of 21 should be lowered to 18?_______________________________________
[tex]\huge\colorbox{black}{not \: { \colorbox{red}{kenny{ \colorbox{red}{}}}}}[/tex]
19. in your knowledge why do you think some law makers and even president Duterte agreed to lower the age of criminal responsibility
Answer:
Further changes will only serve to weaken the system of prevention of juvenile offending and rehabilitation. By lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility, syndicate groups who exploit children into committing crimes for them, will instead use and abuse even younger children to commit their wrongdoings.
Explanation:
#Brainliest
20. lowering criminal age limit
Answer:
I am disagree in lowering criminal age limit because it will be a way that may not help students or young people. At a very young age they don't know yet what is the system of the world. Young people are still the hope for the next generation but if this happen how can they help our country in the future?
21. share your thoughts about lowering the age of criminal responsibility below 18 years old.
Answer:
My thoughts...well i dont know...being criminal. At the young age is not acceptable,i mean they can just educate their self than being a criminal
22. on lowering the age of criminal liability? angry or not??
No because it helps our country to improve at our childerns protection.because many children are victim of bully and thats a sample.No one will be affected in that if we'll not gonna be involved in any crime if we follow the.rules and respect each other fairly.every problems there are answer and plan so wedont need to do something bad.its just that as the year past by many youth are involved in any kind of crime .we just need protection and rules for the punishment if someone will try to do badly crime
it is just desame if angry for kids but if not for some kids who is geting or selling some bad drugs is never been ok.
23. on lowering the age of criminal liability
Lowering the age of criminal liability
Many Filipinos do not agree on lowering the age of criminal liability. Lowering it from age of 15 to 12 isn’t justifiable as they are technically still kids. They said the problem lies with implementation of the Juvenile Justice Welfare Act. Also, these times when minors are being killed for being allegedly being involved with drugs or just being a tambay (loiterer), abuse of power would likely happen.
https://brainly.ph/question/2097816
https://brainly.ph/question/1653916
https://brainly.ph/question/1913298
24. Should the criminal age be lowered to 12 years old?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
basta no, kailangan may reason?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Children in this age are still part of adolescents which is the part when they're finding themselves . Maybe they're aren't aware that they're developing some illness which the parents or guardians should've watch.
25. are you in the favour of lowering the age of criminal responsibility reflect in house bill 8858?
Explanation:
“Lowering the age of criminal responsibility is an act of violence against children. Children who are exploited and driven by adults to commit crimes need to be protected, not further penalized,” Unicef said. “They should be given a second chance to reform and to rehabilitate.”
26. Are you against Lowering the age of criminal responsibility is against child rights?Why?
Answer:
Lowering the age of criminal responsibility is against child rights: UNICEF. ... Sadly, lowering the age of criminal responsibility is an act of violence against children. Children in conflict with the law are already victims of circumstance, mostly because of poverty and exploitation by adult crime syndicates.
27. •cosmetic surgery is good. •the internet is beneficial to students•Philippine-made products are better than imported ones •people below 13 Years old should be prohibited from using cellphones. •the drinking age in the Philippines should be lowered to 15. pro/argument 1. pro/argument 2.pro/argument 3.con/argument 1.con/argument 2.con/argument 3.
Answer:
[tex]\red{\rule{45pt}{999999pt}}[/tex][tex]\orange{\rule{45pt}{999999pt}}[...
28. Are you favor on Lowering the age of criminal responsibility is against child rights?Why?
Answer:
Lowering the age of criminal responsibility will not deter adult offenders from abusing children to commit crimes
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELPS ,
29. what is Lowering age of criminal responsibility? pls help para lang sa thesis
Answer:
Under RA 9344, the minimum age of criminal liability is 15 years old. This means that those within the age of 15 to 18 years old may be detained in youth centers and go through rehabilitation programs while those under 15 years old are exempted from criminal liability but must undergo intervention.
30. Advantages of lowering the age of criminality in the Philippines.
Answer:
There is a lack of evidence and data that children are responsible for the increase in crime rates committed in the Philippines.
Explanation:
Lowering the age of criminal responsibility will not deter adult offenders from abusing children to commit crimes.
